Diddy Sex Abuse Trial: Under Indian American Judge’s Watch, Jury Begins Deliberations

8 hours ago 5
ARTICLE AD BOX

Last Updated:June 30, 2025, 23:19 IST

The twelve-member jury, eight men and four women, retreated behind closed doors after receiving detailed instructions from Judge Subramanian

 Instagram)

Diddy has pleaded not guilty to the charges. (Photo Credits: Instagram)

Jurors on Monday began their deliberations in the high-profile trial of Sean “Diddy" Combs, marking the next step in deciding whether the music mogul used his fame, wealth, and business empire to coerce women into sexual performances. The trial took place in New York under the watch of Indian American Judge Arun Subramanian.

The twelve-member jury, eight men and four women, retreated behind closed doors after receiving detailed instructions from Judge Subramanian. They are now tasked with reviewing seven weeks of testimony, including phone and financial records, and accounts from 34 individuals who came forward as witnesses.

Combs, 55, is facing five serious federal charges: racketeering, sex trafficking, and transportation for prostitution. If found guilty, he could face life in prison. He vehemently denies all allegations and has maintained his innocence throughout the trial.

During closing statements on Friday, Combs’s defence team attacked the credibility of key witnesses, particularly two ex-partners who accused him of serious misconduct. His lawyer described their accusations as motivated by a desire for money and insisted that their relationships were consensual.

On the other hand, prosecutor Maurene Comey painted a starkly different picture, accusing Combs of believing himself to be untouchable. She stated, “he was so far past the line he couldn’t even see it."

Important testimony came from Casandra Ventura and a woman known only as Jane. Both gave powerful accounts of emotional manipulation, threats, and coerced sexual encounters. The defence attempted to discredit them and urged the jury to see their actions as voluntary. Prosecutors countered that such coercion can trap victims in abusive cycles.

Prosecutors argue that Combs operated a criminal enterprise, with staff members there to serve his needs. Alleged crimes include forced labour, kidnapping, bribery, witness tampering, and even arson. However, no members of the organisation testified against him, and none were named as co-conspirators. Many received immunity to ensure they spoke freely.

To find Combs guilty of racketeering, the jury must agree, beyond reasonable doubt, that he conspired to commit at least two of eight specified crimes. Their verdict must be unanimous on each charge—guilty or not guilty.

(With inputs from AFP)

    Location :

    New York, United States of America (USA)

    First Published:

News world Diddy Sex Abuse Trial: Under Indian American Judge’s Watch, Jury Begins Deliberations

Read Entire Article