'How Can You Say…': Supreme Court Questions Centre's 'False Alarm' Argument Over Delayed Bills

2 hours ago 4
ARTICLE AD BOX

Last Updated:September 10, 2025, 23:49 IST

The Centre presented data saying from 1970 to 2025, only 20 bills were withheld out of 17,000 bills, and 90% of the them are granted assent within one month

 PTI/File)

A five-judge Constitution bench headed by CJI BR Gavai is hearing the matter about presidential reference. (Image: PTI/File)

The Supreme Court on Wednesday came down heavily on the Centre, questioning its argument that a false alarm is being raised by states when it comes to pending bills awaiting sanction by the governor.

The remarks came during the hearing on the presidential reference on whether the courts could impose timelines for governors and the President to assess bills passed by assemblies.

A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice of India BR Gavai and comprising Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, PS Narasimha and Atul S Chandurkar, is hearing the matter. Several states, represented by a battery of senior counsel, have opposed the presidential reference.

“How can you say…if bills are pending for four years before the Governor," CJI Gavai asked solicitor general Tushar Mehta, as per a report published by Bar and Bench.

The report said Mehta responded saying from 1970 to 2025, only 20 bills were withheld out of 17,000 bills. He said 90 percent of the bills are granted assent within one month.

The counsel for the states, including senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Manu Singhvi, objected to the data as Mehta had opposed their move to present their own.

To this, CJI Gavai was quoted: “We cannot take the data…it will not be fair to them. We will not go into it. Then we have to unnecessarily go into data…earlier you objected to their data."

The presidential reference has questioned the April 11 judgment passed by a bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan, in which the SC held that governors must act within a reasonable time and that constitutional silence could not be used to stall the democratic process.

authorimg

News Desk

The News Desk is a team of passionate editors and writers who break and analyse the most important events unfolding in India and abroad. From live updates to exclusive reports to in-depth explainers, the Desk d...Read More

The News Desk is a team of passionate editors and writers who break and analyse the most important events unfolding in India and abroad. From live updates to exclusive reports to in-depth explainers, the Desk d...

Read More

First Published:

September 10, 2025, 23:49 IST

News india 'How Can You Say…': Supreme Court Questions Centre's 'False Alarm' Argument Over Delayed Bills

Disclaimer: Comments reflect users’ views, not News18’s. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Read More

Read Entire Article