ARTICLE AD BOX
![]()
Taylor Swift fans are demanding legal action against President Trump after a White House TikTok used her song "The Fate of Ophelia" with his images. The clip's unauthorized use of Swift's music, especially given her protective stance on her work and past criticisms of Trump, has sparked a copyright debate.
Taylor Swift fans are spiraling and this time, it’s not over a breakup rumor or a hidden Easter egg. Swifties are demanding that the world’s most commercially powerful pop star take direct legal action against President Donald Trump after a White House TikTok set to “The Fate of Ophelia” started circulating on Monday.
The clip, which paired Swift’s chart-topping single with images of Trump including his mugshot, triggered a legal frenzy across social media. Swift has famously refused to soften her stance on Trump, he once posted “I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT” and she’s aggressively protective of her masters. That combination is turning this one TikTok into a national copyright flashpoint.
Swifties’ outrage over the White House TikTok isn’t just stan culture — it raises a real copyright test
To ordinary TikTok users, trending sounds come pre-cleared.
To a government office? That’s a different universe. Legally, the White House is treated as a commercial entity on social media, meaning it would have needed sync clearance to use Swift’s song. And in Swift’s world, that approval isn’t rubber-stamped.Fans poured into the comments, dropping lines like: “TAYLOR SWIFT SUE THEM FOR USING YOUR SONG!” and “One freaking huge lawsuit on the horizon.”There are tools in Swift’s legal toolbox, her team could deliver a cease-and-desist or initiate a DMCA takedown, and if they wanted to go nuclear, they could sue the federal government outright.
She’s done both offensive and defensive IP battles before. But the calculus is different here.A lawsuit against a sitting President would immediately become partisan, and Swift has publicly guarded her political image, even when endorsing Harris, she kept it measured: “The choice is yours to make.”So yes, the use appears legally shaky. Yes, fans want blood. But Swift’s brand, not her legal leverage, may be the deciding factor here. Only one person can pull this trigger and she hasn’t said a word yet.
More coverage on NFL:
“Unusual and abnormal”: Insider reveals Joe Alwyn allegedly had mixed feelings about Taylor Swift’s growing relationship with Travis KelceTyreek Hill’s new mystery woman reveal sends fans spiraling amid domestic violence accusations and uncertain NFL career futureEmmanuel Acho reacts to Jennifer Aniston’s “my love” post and the internet immediately starts reading between the lines



English (US) ·