ARTICLE AD BOX
![]()
Revenge quitting is emerging as a defining workplace trend in 2026, with nearly half of US workers admitting to quitting jobs without notice, according to a Monster report.
It might look dramatic on the surface, but it has deep roots. Someone logs off on a Friday and simply never logs back in. They no longer feel the need for goodbye messages or carefully drafted “ostentatious” resignation emails.
Just a sudden absence that compels colleagues to piece together what went wrong. This is sobriquted as “revenge quitting”; it might seem like a fad, but it isn’t. The term has gained traction recently, but the behaviour behind it is older and far more serious. According to a March 2025 survey by job platform Monster, which polled more than 3,600 workers across the US, nearly 47 percent said they had quit a job abruptly to express frustration or dissatisfaction.
More than half, 57 percent, said they had watched a co-worker do the same.
What people mean when they “revenge quit”
Revenge quitting is not about landing a better offer or chasing a higher salary. It is about leaving without ceremony because staying feels like surrender. Unlike a traditional resignation, which follows etiquette and notice periods, this kind of exit is emotional. It is meant to be noticed.Monster’s findings suggest workers increasingly see this as justified.
Eighty-seven percent of respondents said revenge quitting makes sense in a poor work environment. Over half described it as a valid form of protest. The language here matters. Employees are not framing these exits as unprofessional; they are framing them as necessary.That shift says something unsettling about modern work. When people stop believing their concerns will be heard, departure becomes the only form of speech left.
Why employees reach the breaking point
The assumption that people quit primarily over pay does not hold up. The survey shows the strongest triggers are cultural, not financial.A toxic work environment topped the list at 32 percent, closely followed by poor management or leadership at 31 percent. Feeling disrespected or undervalued accounted for another 23 percent. Issues like low pay, benefits, or work-life balance barely registered in comparison.In other words, people do not usually walk out because of money. They walk out because they feel dismissed, managed poorly, or worn down by leadership that does not change.
When one exit becomes many
Revenge quitting has a visibility problem for employers. Once one person leaves suddenly, others start paying attention. Monster found that 15 percent of workers had seen six or more colleagues quit abruptly. Another 19 percent had witnessed two to four such exits.Each departure leaves behind more than just extra work. It plants doubt. It raises questions no performance review can answer: If they left like that, should I be thinking about it too? The damage is slow but cumulative, eroding trust, morale, and any sense of stability.
Not impulsive, just delayed
Despite the name, revenge quitting is rarely impulsive. Many workers stay far longer than they should before leaving.The survey shows 18 percent endured more than two years before finally quitting.
Others stayed six months, a year, or sometimes longer. By the time they leave without notice, the decision has usually been rehearsed silently for months. What looks sudden to managers is often the end of a long internal argument.
What might have changed the outcome
When asked what could have stopped them from quitting abruptly, workers gave straightforward answers. Better workplace culture led the list, cited by 63 percent. Nearly half said recognition, a new manager, or even a raise might have made a difference.
Clear career progression also mattered.
A warning, not a phase
Revenge quitting is not a social media stunt or a generational quirk. It is a response to environments where employees feel powerless, unheard, and replaceable. The Monster survey makes one thing clear: people are not leaving to make a scene. They are leaving because they believe nothing else will change.For employers, the message is uncomfortable but necessary. If people are choosing silence over notice, it is not defiance, it is resignation in its truest sense.And once that trust is gone, no exit interview can bring it back.


English (US) ·