ARTICLE AD BOX
(Image via Getty Images and @akayassinX)
A fiery dispute between content creator Schlep and Roblox Corporation that erupted a few days back is now intensifying. At the center of this conflict is the recent Roblox categorization of independent predator hunting efforts.
They reportedly called it dangerous vigilantism. Schlep has given a sharp public statement, denying claims of the platform and accusing them of spreading false news.Here is all we know about the platform and content creator controversy.
Schlep issues a statement against Roblox’s remarks
In a passionate response online, Michael “Schlep” made sure to challenge Roblox’s official statements directly. The company asserted that “taking the law into your hands” is unsafe, both offline and online. In this statement, Schlep took issue with the statement and argued that the process he follows is fundamentally collaborative with the authorities, and it is not just some solo act of justice.
Schlep's core question was quite simple yet powerful. He asked, “How is handing the information to the cops, them making arrests, 'taking the law into my own hands'. This is NOT True.” “Stop lying about me,” he further added, calling out Roblox publicly to stop what he perceived to be lying about his way of working.
What is going on between Schlep and Roblox?
The entire clash highlights one of the fundamental disagreements between the two sides on the methodologies.
The position of Roblox, with all the controversies and backlash, is declining. It is now out and open that Roblox, as a platform, poses dangers to the young crowd. There are independent actors on the platform who impersonate and lure the kids to other platforms, risking their lives. Despite independent actors online threat, Roblox has maintained that they are working with law enforcement authorities to ensure the online safety of its users.Schlep, on the other hand, has defended the process as a vital supplement for official channels. He insists that he is one of the lone actors gathering the evidence and turning it over to officials. He has expressed frustration that the platform has labelled his process as dangerous, despite the same yielding some verifiable law enforcement results.
Michael schlep previously even stated out in the open that he is not a vigilante, defining all his actions as being in cooperation with proper channels. All the arrests made as per his information, he contended, validated his approach, and proved the effectiveness as well as safety. The recent statements of Roblox, though, suggest a deeper disconnect between the platform and the creator review processes. While many might take sides, as long as the results are produced, all will work just right.