ARTICLE AD BOX
Last Updated:March 16, 2026, 23:05 IST
Max Verstappen has never been shy about criticizing F1's direction. But is he a principled purist or just a grumpy champion? The answer, annoyingly, might be both.

Red Bull Racing's Max Verstappen (Photo Credit: AP)
Verstappen is called “Mad Max" for a reason — and boy, does he live up to the name.
Of course, the nickname partly refers to the Dutchman being a maniacal motorsport junkie who can’t get enough racing — whether it’s F1, sim racing, or now endurance racing (best of luck at the Nürburgring, Max).
It also reflects the fearless driver who will exploit even the tiniest gap in the toughest situations (very much in the spirit of one of his idols, Ayrton Senna).
But there’s a third reason too. And it’s the one even casual fans recognise.
Max Verstappen loses his temper, loudly and publicly, and makes sure the whole world hears about it.
Which brings us to the current situation.
Let’s cut to the chase: most of us already know why Max is all over the headlines.
And for those who don’t, here it is simply: Max Verstappen hates the 2026 F1 regulations.
The four-time world champion has become the loudest critic of the sport’s new era: one built around radically redesigned hybrid power units that split output almost 50-50 between internal combustion and electric power.
What exactly has he said about it?
Well… let’s just run through a quick compilation of the man’s greatest hits so far this year.
Fiesty.
Okay, let’s be honest here. Has Max come across as a bit of a grumpy “get off my lawn" guy lately? Absolutely.
Could some of his anger be tied to Red Bull suddenly looking… not very good? Probably.
But are all of Verstappen’s criticisms just surface-level angry rants? I believe not.
Number 1: Verstappen the Grinch
Before we go any further, let me be clear: I am NOT endorsing EVERYTHING Max says.
The first thing that needs addressing is his claim that people who enjoy the new era of F1 “don’t know what racing is about."
Here’s the uncomfortable truth: That statement is both valid and completely unnecessary.
Yes, both. You thought I was going to pick a side? Sorry to disappoint.
Let’s start with why it’s unfair.
Fans are…fans. It’s true — we may perhaps not understand why this new era isn’t ‘real racing’, from a driver’s perspective. But we do know whether it is fun to consume.
So, what exactly is the point of dismissing fans for enjoying the product they’re watching? Sports evolve. They always have. And Formula 1 has reinvented itself repeatedly across its 70-plus-year history.
Whether we like it or not, there is always a bigger picture surrounding the sport. F1, much like any other sport, doesn’t exist in a vacuum.
Environmental pressures, political considerations, technological development — all of these factors shape the rules.
So when Verstappen dismisses fans who enjoy the new racing, it risks sounding like the classic “back in my day…" argument.
That doesn’t mean he’s wrong about everything. But it does mean the delivery sometimes undermines the message.
Then again, Max being Max is exactly why people listen to him in the first place. He is unapologetically blunt, and that honesty earns him both admiration and frustration in equal measure.
Now let’s talk about why he might actually have a point.
Because here’s the thing: Verstappen is not the only one saying this. Far from it.
Fans have spent decades arguing about whether each new era of Formula 1 is still “real F1."
And the 2026 regulations have reopened that philosophical debate in a big way.
At a surface level, the new racing mechanics — boost buttons, aggressive battery deployment, energy harvesting — sometimes resemble something closer to a video game.
Hence, Verstappen’s now-famous Mario Kart analogy, which he repeated multiple times in Shanghai.
So, for Max, the deeper issue isn’t the visuals. It’s what the regulations have done to the act of driving itself.
The heavy emphasis on energy recovery means drivers are sometimes forced to manage battery levels through corners rather than attack them at the limit.
Corners that once represented the ultimate test of bravery and skill can now become strategic energy-harvesting zones.
And that’s where Verstappen’s criticism resonates most strongly — at least from a driver’s perspective.
Because if certain elements of driver skill are gradually being removed from the equation, then the question becomes unavoidable:
What exactly should Formula 1 prioritise: engineering efficiency or pure racing?
At the same time, F1’s leadership appears confident the spectacle is working. Some stakeholders believe the new regulations have improved the show. Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff, for example, recently insisted that: “All the indicators, all the data, say people love it."
But those claims have not gone entirely unchallenged.
After the Australian Grand Prix, many fans accused F1 of selectively moderating criticism online, which only reinforced the perception that the rules remain deeply divisive.
It’s entirely possible that casual viewers are enjoying the spectacle more than hardcore fans. If that’s the case, F1 might decide that broad appeal outweighs purist concerns.
But if the sport convinces itself that everything is perfect, Verstappen’s warning may still apply:
“It will come and bite them back in the ass."
For now, the jury is still very much out.
Number 2: Why Red Bull’s Struggles Aren’t the Whole Story
Let’s not pretend otherwise: Red Bull have looked completely lost at times this season.
The Australian Grand Prix was rough enough — Verstappen dragging the car to sixth while teammate Isack Hadjar retired with engine trouble.
Shanghai was even worse.
Verstappen retired from the race, and Hadjar fought hard just to salvage eighth place.
So yes, it’s entirely fair to ask whether Verstappen’s anger is partly the result of Red Bull suddenly falling behind.
He’s human. Of course, frustration plays a role. This is Max Verstappen we’re talking about — one of the most competitive drivers this sport has ever seen.
But there’s also strong evidence that this issue runs deeper than a bad car. Because Verstappen has been criticising aspects of Formula 1 for years, even while dominating it.
Take the timeline.
2022: Porpoising Rule Changes Spark Pushback
While comfortably leading the championship, Verstappen criticised the FIA’s anti-porpoising regulation tweaks as “over the top."
2023: Sprint Races Come Under Fire
Despite winning most of them, Verstappen repeatedly called for sprint races to be scrapped, arguing they encouraged drivers to “just survive" rather than race.
2023: Early Warnings About 2026
After early simulator runs, Verstappen warned the new regulations could create overly energy-dependent racing. At the time, many dismissed those concerns.
2024: The Singapore Swearing Saga
Verstappen was punished by the FIA for swearing during a press conference, prompting a one-word protest in the next media session.
2024: Abu Dhabi Steward Rage
Even after clinching the championship, Verstappen blasted stewards as “stupid idiots" following a controversial penalty.
2024-2025: Physical Toll of the Cars
Verstappen admitted the current generation of cars had left his “back falling apart."
2025: FIA Fines Criticised
When the FIA introduced harsher penalties for swearing, Verstappen publicly argued the governing body should focus on safety and racing instead.
Were they all noble pursuits? I’ll leave that up to you to decide.
But taken together, the pattern becomes clear: Verstappen complains — a lot — but not only when things are going badly.
Sometimes he complains when he’s winning everything.
And that strengthens the argument that at least some of his criticism is philosophical rather than self-serving.
As Verstappen himself put it:
“I would say the same if I was winning races. I care about the racing product."
Number 3: Why the FIA Still Needs to Look at the Rules
Regardless of where you stand in this debate, there are legitimate technical issues worth examining.
One example is race starts.
Under the 2026 rules, the removal of the MGU-H means drivers must rev engines significantly higher for around 10 seconds to spool the turbo.
They also need to harvest enough electrical energy on the formation lap to ensure strong acceleration at the start.
Verstappen has struggled with that process so far. Take, for instance, Australia, where he suffered a slow launch due to “no battery" — and the same issue hit teammate Hadjar, who initially surged forward before suddenly losing power.
Shanghai didn’t go much better.
Verstappen dropped from eighth to 15th on the opening lap of the sprint race.
When asked about it afterwards, his response was pure Verstappen:
“Honestly I didn’t even ask. They said they would fix it. So I hope that will be fixed for tomorrow."
It wasn’t.
Despite qualifying eighth for the main race, Verstappen had fallen to 11th by lap two before eventually retiring with a power unit failure.
So now comes the real question.
Are Red Bull simply struggling — or is this a glimpse of how chaotic the new regulations might make racing across the grid?
That’s something the FIA and F1 leadership will need to monitor closely.
Why? Because Verstappen’s frustration goes beyond a single bad weekend. It’s rooted in a deeper fear that Formula 1 is drifting away from what drivers consider pure racing.
And that thought may be what keeps him awake at night.
After two years of warning about the implications of the new rules and seeing them arrive anyway, he may genuinely be wondering whether this version of Formula 1 is worth the fight.
Because at the end of the day:
“You can only take so much, right?"
First Published:
March 16, 2026, 23:05 IST
News sports formula-one Mad Max vs F1: Is Verstappen ‘Saving’ The Sport -- Or Just Bitterly Complaining? | Opinion
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users’ views, not News18’s. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Read More
1 hour ago
7







English (US) ·