Opinion: The Big Misread: Revenue Per Employee Isn't Productivity. It's A Legacy Illusion

1 hour ago 3
ARTICLE AD BOX

And yet, the myth persists.

The larger risk, though, is cultural.

As AI tools get embedded in everyday workflows, something subtle but serious starts to happen. Employees begin to trust the machine more than their own judgment. Internal logic gets replaced by templated outputs. The company tone is slowly flattened into generic phrasing. Over time, the enterprise starts losing its voice, its reasoning muscle, and its institutional memory. And no dashboard captures that loss, especially not revenue per employee.

This is where the metric does real damage. It feeds the illusion of hyper-efficiency while core capabilities erode. Boards see a number moving in the right direction and assume all is well. But behind the scenes, delivery is fragmented, teams are overstretched, and decision quality is slipping.

The need of the hour isn’t a new metric. It’s a better lens. We need to go beyond topline revenue and ask harder questions: How much of that revenue is truly non-linear? How much depends on subcontractors or third parties? Are margins growing with revenue? Are we tracking what AI tools are learning from our systems and teams?

Revenue per employee can’t answer any of that. It’s an output stat, not a health check.

Instead of over-relying on a single number, leadership teams need to look at a broader set of indicators: profit per employee, automation return on investment, customer retention, internal talent development, and delivery mix. These metrics demand more work to track, yes. But they also tell the truth.

What’s on the line isn’t just accurate reporting. It’s how clearly a company sees its own direction. When leaders treat lean as a strength or automation as efficiency, the business starts slipping. They hold back on hiring, stretch teams too far, and lose the experience they depend on. All this while chasing a number that lost meaning years ago.

Technology firms in 2025 aren’t running on manpower. They’re running on models, platforms, partners, and hybrid teams. Trying to evaluate them through the lens of revenue per employee is like assessing a streaming service by its DVD sales. It’s not just outdated. It’s irrelevant.

So the next time a company boasts about rising revenue per employee, ask what’s driving it. Ask what’s missing from the denominator. Ask whether that growth is sustainable, or just a statistical trick. Because when you strip away the optics, what you often find isn’t productivity. It’s exposure.

And exposure, as we’ve seen too often, is the last thing any enterprise can afford to misread.

Sanchit Vir Gogia is Chief Analyst, Founder and CEO of Greyhound Research.

Read Entire Article