ARTICLE AD BOX
New Delhi: In 2003, an automotive component manufacturing unit was facing a critical decision. After seven consecutive years of losses, the business had reached a point where its survival was uncertain. A potential buyer, who had initially shown interest in taking over the unit, backed out after due diligence. The owners were left with only two choices: turn the business around or shut it down.
At the time, the company was reporting losses of approximately ₹12 crore on a turnover of ₹38 crore. The situation was not just financially strained and there were no easy answers. . When Ravi Gilani, Founder and Managing Consultant, Goldratt Bharat, began working with the organisation, one of the first questions he asked the leadership team was simple: how do you measure your performance?
The answer revealed the root of the problem.
The company measured performance in terms of tons of gears produced and sold. Each department was focused on increasing output in tons, as that was their primary metric. On the surface, this appeared logical. In reality, it was driving the business in the wrong direction.
Despite low sales of one of its key products, the differential gear set, the company had accumulated a large inventory of crown wheels. The reason was structural. Crown wheels were heavier, and since output was measured in tons, departments prioritised producing them over pinions, which were lighter. However, both were essential to complete the final product! This led to a mismatch. Inventory kept increasing, but saleable products remained limited.
The issue was not effort or capability. It was a misaligned measurement.
A Business in Deep Distress
By the early 2000s, Eicher Demm, now known as Eicher Engineering Components,had monthly losses nearing ₹1 crore, management pressure was mounting. The organisation had already explored exit options, and the possibility of closure was real.
Internally, the belief was that weak demand was the primary issue. However, this assumption prevented the company from identifying the deeper operational constraints affecting performance.
Measurements Drive Behavior
Ravi Gilani introduced a fundamental change in how the company evaluated performance. Instead of focusing on output in tons, the organisation shifted to two key metrics: throughput and OTIF( On-Time-In-Full) delivery.
Throughput, defined as net sales minus truly variable costs, became the primary financial measure. OTIF became the primary operational measure, reflecting the company’s ability to deliver what customers actually ordered.
This shift was not immediately accepted. When the proposal was made to align all senior leadership incentives to these common metrics, there was resistance. The leadership team questioned what would happen to individual accountability.
Despite the company’s financial decline during the past seven years, most members of the leadership team had received 2-3 promotions during that period. This highlighted the disconnect between individual performance metrics and overall business performance.
Eventually, the team agreed to adopt common performance measures for a trial period of three months.
The results were immediate. Within the first month, sales increased by 29 percent.
Diagnosing the Real Constraint
Alongside the shift in measurement, the organisation also identified its true operational constraint. Delivery performance was extremely poor, with initial OTIF levels at around 4-5 percent. This directly impacted customer confidence and repeat business.
A deeper analysis revealed that raw material shortages were a major issue. Suppliers were not delivering on time because they were not being paid promptly. This pointed to a cash constraint, rather than a demand or capacity issue.
This insight was critical. It changed the focus of the turnaround from improving everything to fixing one key bottleneck.
Fixing the System
Once the constraint was identified as cash, targeted actions were taken to improve liquidity and stabilise operations.
A 3% discount was introduced for customers who made immediate payments, accelerating cash inflows. This enabled the company to pay suppliers on time, ensuring consistent availability of raw materials.
Operationally, the organisation aligned all functions around improving throughput and delivery performance. Weekly reviews replaced monthly reporting cycles, enabling faster decision-making. Production planning was adjusted to ensure completion of orders rather than maximising output in isolation.
Importantly, these changes were implemented without new capital investment. Instead, the focus was on better utilisation of existing resources, improved coordination, and tighter control over inventory.
Rapid and Sustained Results
The impact of these changes was both rapid and sustained.
Within five months, the company achieved a 29 percent growth in sales. Within a year, net sales increased by 57 percent and throughput improved by 43 percent. Delivery performance improved dramatically, with OTIF levels rising to between 95 and 98 percent.
Over time, the transformation extended beyond operational recovery. The business expanded from a single factory to four manufacturing units. It also strengthened its position with customers, becoming a preferred supplier in its segment.
From Turnaround to Growth
What began as a turnaround effort evolved into a long-term growth story. The company moved from sustained losses to consistent profitability, demonstrating that structural alignment can create enduring results.
A key factor in this transformation was the shift from local optimisation to system-level thinking. By aligning measurements, decisions, and actions around the constraint, the organisation was able to unlock performance that had previously remained inaccessible.
Insights for for Businesses Today
The Eicher Engineering case highlights a broader lesson for organisations. Many companies continue to measure performance using metrics that do not reflect overall business outcomes. This often leads to local optima but not global optima.
The instinct to cut costs or increase activity does not always solve the problem. In many cases, it makes the system more chaotic without improving results.
The more effective approach is to identify the constraint and align the entire organisation around it. Whether the constraint lies in cash, supply, demand, or operations, clarity is the first step toward improvement.The turnaround of Eicher Engineering Components is not just a story of recovery. It is a demonstration of how changing what an organisation measures can change how it performs.
By shifting focus from output to throughput, aligning teams around common goals, and addressing the real constraint, Goldratt Bharat helped transform a struggling business into a growing enterpriseFor organisations navigating uncertainty today, the lesson is clear. Sustainable improvement does not come from doing more. It comes from focusing on what truly matters.
English (US) ·