These 4 Laws Protect Civilian Infra Amid War: Will US, Israel, Iran Be Punished For Flouting Them?

Last Updated:April 06, 2026, 12:52 IST

Which are the international laws that prohibit targeting of civilian infrastructure during war? Have the US, Israel and Iran flouted these laws? Will they punished? News18 explains

Targeting civilian infrastructure during war is prohibited by several foundational international laws, which establish that only military objectives are legitimate targets.

Which are these laws? What happens when they are flouted? Amid the ongoing conflict, have the US, Israel and Iran flouted these laws? News18 explains.

THE FOUR INTERNATIONAL THAT PROTECT CIVILIAN INFRA DURING WAR

1. The Geneva Conventions (1949) and Additional Protocols (1977)

The Fourth Geneva Convention and its Additional Protocol I (1977) provide the most direct protections for civilian infrastructure.

Article 52 of Additional Protocol I explicitly defines “civilian objects" and prohibits direct attacks against them.

Article 54 of Additional Protocol I prohibits the destruction of “objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population," such as food stores, agricultural areas, and drinking water installations.

Article 18 of the Fourth Geneva Convention specifically states that civilian hospitals may in no circumstances be the object of attack.

2. The Hague Conventions (1899 and 1907)

These conventions laid the groundwork for modern rules of war, focusing on the conduct of hostilities.

Hague Regulations prohibit the bombardment of “towns, villages, dwellings, or buildings which are undefended". They state that parties to a conflict must distinguish between civilian property and military targets.

3. The Nuremberg Principles (1945/1950)

The Nuremberg Principles, derived from the trials of Nazi war criminals, codified “War Crimes" and “Crimes Against Humanity" into international law.

Principle VI defines war crimes to include the wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.

It established that individuals, including military and political leaders, can be held personally accountable for ordering attacks on civilian populations and infrastructure.

4. The United Nations Charter (1945)

While the UN Charter primarily governs the legality of going to war (jus ad bellum), it underpins all international humanitarian laws.

Article 2(4) requires members to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity of any state.

The Charter provides the legal authority for the UN and its bodies to investigate violations of the laws of war, including the targeting of critical civilian infrastructure like power grids or water systems.

HAVE US, ISRAEL, IRAN FLOUTED THESE LAWS?

Various international bodies and legal experts have alleged that the United States, Israel, and Iran have all flouted international laws by targeting or damaging civilian infrastructure. These actions are primarily scrutinised under the Geneva Conventions (prohibition of attacks on civilian objects) and the UN Charter (prohibition of the use of force).

IS THERE A PUNISHMENT?

When these laws are flouted, the following mechanisms are typically triggered:

International Criminal Court (ICC) Prosecution: Individuals (leaders and commanders) can be prosecuted for war crimes. However, since the US, Israel, and Iran are not members of the ICC, the court lacks direct jurisdiction unless the UN Security Council refers a case—a move currently blocked by geopolitical divisions.

Universal Jurisdiction: National courts in third-party countries can theoretically arrest and prosecute individuals for “grave breaches" of the Geneva Conventions if they enter their territory.

Under international law, a state found liable for “internationally wrongful acts" is obligated to provide reparations or compensation for the damage caused.

States often face “countermeasures," such as the revocation of residency permits for nationals, asset freezes, or trade embargoes, as seen with recent UAE actions against Iranian interests.

While the UN General Assembly or Human Rights Council can issue condemnatory resolutions (as they have recently done), these are typically non-binding and function as “moral" or diplomatic pressure rather than physical punishment.

KEY FAQs

Which 4 laws prohibit target civilian infrastructure?

Geneva Conventions, Hague Conventions, Nuremberg Principles, United Nations Charter.

Have US, Israel, Iran flouted them?

United States – alleged strikes on civilian infrastructure in Iran

Israel – strikes reported to violate UN Charter & target civilian areas

Iran – retaliatory attacks also accused of breaching international law

What happens if these laws are violated?

War crimes merit prosecution via International Criminal Court and action by United Nations Security Council. However, in reality, there is limited enforcement due to politics and jurisdiction issues.

With agency inputs

News explainers These 4 Laws Protect Civilian Infra Amid War: Will US, Israel, Iran Be Punished For Flouting Them?

Read More